skills.by true||false
LibraryHow to run

A product of true||false

Every item lists its source, license and what we changed.

library
skillworkflowJesse Vincent (obra)

verification-before-completion

Requires running verification commands and showing output before claiming work is done.

source

looks for

  • about to say done, fixed or passing
  • before commit or PR

SKILL.md

Verification Before Completion

Overview

Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Failures

ClaimRequiresNot Sufficient
Tests passTest command output: 0 failuresPrevious run, "should pass"
Linter cleanLinter output: 0 errorsPartial check, extrapolation
Build succeedsBuild command: exit 0Linter passing, logs look good
Bug fixedTest original symptom: passesCode changed, assumed fixed
Regression test worksRed-green cycle verifiedTest passes once
Agent completedVCS diff shows changesAgent reports "success"
Requirements metLine-by-line checklistTests passing

Red Flags - STOP

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • Tired and wanting work over
  • ANY wording implying success without having run verification

Rationalization Prevention

ExcuseReality
"Should work now"RUN the verification
"I'm confident"Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once"No exceptions
"Linter passed"Linter ≠ compiler
"Agent said success"Verify independently
"I'm tired"Exhaustion ≠ excuse
"Partial check is enough"Partial proves nothing
"Different words so rule doesn't apply"Spirit over letter

Key Patterns

Tests:

✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):

✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

Build:

✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)

Requirements:

✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

Agent delegation:

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task
  • Delegating to agents

Rule applies to:

  • Exact phrases
  • Paraphrases and synonyms
  • Implications of success
  • ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

audit trail

source
obra/superpowers
author
Jesse Vincent (obra)
license
MIT
pinned
22f0b463e7a5
imported
2026-11-13
verified
2026-11-13
changes
None; unmodified upstream files.
privacy scan
pass
scripts
none
in the zip
2 files

works with

Claude, Codex, ChatGPT

more in workflow

  • ruletrueorfalse

    agent-directives

    Gives every agent the same baseline rules on scope, reuse, reading order and verification.

    • a new agent or session starting in the repo
    • blind repo-wide scans
    • new dependencies added without a check
    Claude · Codex · ChatGPT
  • ruletrueorfalse

    agent-team

    Routes each ask to one owning role, then enforces work order → specialist → verify → handoff.

    • a new task with no clear owner
    • work that touches more than one module or repo
    • who should do this?
    Claude · Codex · ChatGPT
  • workflowtrueorfalse

    handoff

    Records done / not done / decisions / files / risks / next 3 actions so work survives a role switch or a pause.

    • end of a session with work unfinished
    • a role switch inside a work order
    • QA failed and goes back to the implementer
    Claude · Codex · ChatGPT